|
Arkham
Asylum
Writer:
Grant Morrison
Artist: Dave McKean
128 page Painted Graphic Novel
Published 1989 DC Comics
$14.95 Paperback
Reviewed by Benjamin Russell
Grant
Morrison has been accused of being a genius. The reason why I say
"accused" is because there are fans of his work that believe
he is good enough that he need not be wasting his time with the
superhero genre. But truth be told, Morrison warms to the concept
of superheroes, their surrealism fuels him in some manner, creating
within the ideas that make their way onto the surface of the twenty-four
page pamphlet. On
his webpage, Morrison is quoted as saying that he's always written
"work-for-hire mainstream adventure material in tandem with
the more ‘challenging’ or ‘personal’ projects." The former
of which refers to superheroes.
Animal
Man was a superhero comic. The eponymous character wore spandex
and a silly goggle face-mask. And in Morrison’s final issue of the
comic, he meets "evil mastermind behind the scenes." He
meets Morrison; Animal Man meets his maker -- something that is
never supposed to happen, according to many old myths. There is a
reason why Zeus avoids coming to Niobe in his full aspect, and why
Jehovah communicates through whirlwinds and flaming foliage. When
Vladimir Nabokov’s character Krug discovers that he is a fictional
character in the novel Bend Sinister, Nabokov has to intervene
for his creation by driving him mad so that he won’t have
to deal with the full impact of the discovery.
Krug
pulls back the veil that allows him to see the gnostic mysteries
of his universe, and is forced to go mad as a result. The same
is true of characters in Morrison’s Arkham Asylum, a Batman
graphic novel, fully-painted by Dave McKean. Morrison and McKean
carefully exploit the full potential of the medium of comics. Comic
books, with their dual media of text and visual art, are perhaps
most adept at depicting parallel storylines. The captions can provide
one tale, while the images can provide a second, and the juxtaposition
that the reader is privy to is Art. This is far more difficult to
do in other existing combinations of the textual and the visual
-- film, for instance. Spilt screens or asynchronous soundtracks
have proven largely unsuccessful in allowing meaning to emerge from
the curious discordant overlap. Even books like Danielewski’s brilliant
House of Leaves -- which mixes narratives, one taking place
in the footnotes -- cannot be read with the same sense of simultaneity
that comics provide.
In
DC Comics’ Arkham Asylum, Grant Morrison and Dave McKean
provide the jaded and familiar pulp character of the Batman with
a literary magnificence that has since been emulated and never equaled.
This is done by placing the ordinary story -- Our Hero enters into
the Lions’ Den to exchange himself for the lamb/victim, and yet
Emerges Victorious -- against a tapestry of mystical symbolism,
psychology, and commentary about the secret nature of the world.
The
outer face of the text provides a familiar piece of high concept:
Batman must be crazy; anyone who dresses up in a cape and a mask
and runs about trying to fight crime is certainly going to strike
fear into the hearts of criminals -- and anyone else who he comes
across. But not a fear of retribution and vengeance, but instead
the creepy peripheral fear that one wants to scratch at when in
the presence of someone who has the stink of crazy about him. But
the true story is the same as that of Nabokov's Krug, of Buddy "Animal
Man" Baker: character's learning the lesson that you need to
see reality through filters, because you aren't meant to understand
it all. What secret knowledge you can divine, you should do through
metaphors and stories so that you are protected by symbolism.
The
primary running allusion is that of the journey of Alice’s Adventures
in Wonderland. Carroll’s tale is a oft-misinterpreted allegory.
It has been appropriated by contemporary youth as a drug tale, and
has been redrawn in tortured fashion by the world’s current crop
of madness fetishists. But Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland
is not so much about madness as it is about Alice learning to deal
with the double truths of the adult world. She learns moderation
and control in the face of a series of monomaniacs who are distorted
extensions of one aspect of personality. It’s not hard to see why
in today’s psychomedical climate one would see it as a tale of lunatics,
based both on the Cheshire Cats' assertion that everyone in Wonderland
is mad, and the non-unrealistic diagnosis that many neurological
diseases come about because of an unhealthy chemical imbalance that
highlights one neural aspect over all others.
But
Alice’s journey is not a test of her sanity, in fact, she remains
quite unfazed by the whole series of experiences, rather properly
nonplussed by the entire proceedings. Her journey is one or revelation
about how the adult world -- the one that she, as a pre-adolescent,
is about to be indoctrinated into -- functions. Batman is already
an adult, and knows how the world functions, but the story takes
place on April Fool’s Day, when the Feast of Fools brings about
a temporary reversal of roles and rules. But, as Dekker’s Shoemaker’s
Holiday illustrates, the Feast Of Fools tradition is one that has to be sanctioned
by an authority. The inmates cannot take over the asylum without
the aid of he one ultimately in charge. The plot eventually reveals
that this is Dr. Milo, whose mad perception of Batman can’t distinguish
between his humanity and the symbol that he wears as his cloak.
Milo is unable to separate the physical symbols from their representative
meanings, which gives him a peculiar insight into Batman’s drive
and neurosis, as he eerily knows Batman’s central motivations, and
mocks them, calling him a "mama’s boy." Morrison
is essentially equating Batman's costume with Amadeus Arkham's mad
cross-dressing.
The
authority figure who sanctions the Feast of Fools is supposed to
reinstitute control when the holiday has reached its tenure, but
as Milo is mad himself, the holiday threatens to break it’s rules
and run unchecked. Alice, by the end of her journey, learns to have
confidence that she can survive in the world. But this cannot happen
if someone like Milo has upset the natural balance. But because
of the parallels between Arkham's mania and Batman's -- who, incidentally,
is never referred to as Bruce Wayne, and who briefly talks about
"Batman" in the third person -- and because of the latter's
doubts about his sanity, Batman is thereby suspect as the agent
to restore the natural order upon the world. The latter half
of the story deals with his struggle to prove himself.
In
a deck of tarot cards, each suit also tells a story of a journey
through world that swings precariously out of balance and has the
balance restored at the end. Tarot symbolism is threaded all throughout
Arkham Asylum, from the symbol of the Hanged Man as Batman
enters the asylum (holding the position of Campbell’s "Belly of the
Whale experience" in the story of the major arcana), to the bookends of the
story depicting the Moon alongside epigrams from Lewis Carroll.
As both Aleister Crowley and Carl Jung are mentioned in the text,
it would be foolish to think that their respective texts on interpretations
of the tarot and the effects of archetypal symbols upon the psyche
do not somehow lend themselves to further interpretation of the
novel. Also, a general exploration of ambi-sexuality is a dominant
thematic thread, with echoes in the Joker’s dialogue, the initial
association of Harvey Dent with the Lovers tarot card, and the casual
psychosis of Amadeus Arkham dressing up in his mother’s bridal gown.
Norman Bates even makes a brief guest appearance. But, the reversal
of gender roles is only one of the requirements of a Feast of Fools
celebration, it is to be expected that something as seemingly inviolate
as gender becomes transmutable as well, and Morrison serves the
reader well by including a reference to the clown fish, a biological
precedent for gender-swapping, with additional connotations of the
Fool.
The
weavings of symbolism are so intricate in Arkham Asylum that
it is tempting to miss them altogether. Primarily because it would
take more research than comic book reader is typically used to in
order to fully understand the craft and purpose of the book, but
also because it’s a Batman graphic novel. Ultimately, any deep meaning
that Morrison is chasing in the text will be undermined by the demi-century
of silliness that is the irrefutable baggage of the main character
and his Rouge’s Gallery. The Joker, in his role of ambisexual predator,
and given the fact that Morrison redefines his psychosis as mystical
-- the Joker’s particular neurological disorder is effectively that
he has no veils, and he sees the deity behind the protective guise
of the burning bush -- takes on more meaning and force than he has
in any other comic. The psychological victory of Harvey Dent at
the end of the book, however, would make no sense without the context
of the wider comic book. Morrison only provides the briefest of
introductory character summaries, the clunkiest dialogue in the
book, assuming that we can't help but be familiar with the archetypes
of Batman’s world, and the story suffers as a result. If he could
have created his own heroes, and if he had the time, space, and
ability to flesh them out as he pleased, the novel would have been
that much more manic, that much more full of internal context.
Arkham Asylum may be the ultimate example of how even "mainstream
adventure" can walk a twisted, literary road and be highly
significant in the way that it deals with commercial properties,
but because the characters have so many aspects engendered by corporate
concerns, the work will always be wounded and limited.
Arkham
Asylum definitively proves that Morrison's enjoyment of the
superhero is justified. But when Morrison and Animal Man have
their famous conversation, Morrison complains that in a serial comic
"nothing matters. It all just comes back, good as new."
He later points out that "there's not enough space... in twenty-four
pages." Unfortunately, what Arkham Asylum also
proves that just because you have more pages, doesn't mean you can
say what needs to be said. Batman is a flawed authority and
should therefore be unable to completely revoke the Feast of Fools.
But the mainstream adventure format requires a square-one beginning,
with no real growth or change. Because, like Animal Man, it is "a world
created by a committee," Arkham Asylum must also return
to the characters to the bright, flat limbo of serial existence.
Batman's victory is a hollow one that sounds dully against the elegant
complexities of the work, and the ending feels rushed. Morrison
may be satisfied with producing for the work-for-hire mainstream,
but we should not be, not when it limits the success of a potentially
great tale.
Highly
Recommended.

Benjamin Russell is a freelance writer, which sounds better than
"temp", but not as cool as Jon Sable, Freelance.

PopImage
Forum - Discuss this message at the PopImage forum.
|